Skip to main content
Back to search resultsResolution 010405

Urging the City of Philadelphia and the State of Pennsylvania to support and utilize a non name-based surveillance systems of HIV reporting and, if needed, for the City of Philadelphia to not comply with a proposed name based HIV reporting system.

View file history View official file on Legistar →

File details

Status
Adopted
Type
Resolution
Introduced
May 24, 2001
Sponsors
COCouncilmember OrtizCRCouncilmember Reynolds BrownCGCouncilmember GoodeCCCouncilmember CohenCDCouncilmember DiCiccoCTCouncilmember TascoCKCouncilmember KenneyCMCouncilmember MillerCCCouncilmember ClarkeCKCouncilmember KrajewskiCBCouncilmember BlackwellCNCouncilmember NutterCLCouncilmember LongstrethBrian J. O'NeillCRCouncilmember Rizzo

Full Bill

WHEREAS, Non name-based surveillance systems, such as unique identifier reporting, support our public health goals by providing data which can help us allocate limited resources while supporting efforts to target and evaluate prevention programs, project the direction of the epidemic, while assuring anonymity and not deterring people from seeking HIV testing and care; and

WHEREAS, The state administration has proposed mandatory state wide name based reporting for HIV positive individuals and in the absence of guaranteed access to health care and strong privacy protections, the negative aspects of name reporting outweigh the potential benefits of this approach; and

WHEREAS, HIV name reporting has been shown to be a deterrent to individuals seeking HIV testing and treatment, and the implementation of HIV name reporting is not currently accompanied by guaranteed access to care and treatment; and

WHEREAS, Philadelphia's refusal to comply with the names based HIV reporting will apply pressure upon the State to rethink their HIV surveillance proposal and develop a plan consistent with the pronounced needs of its citizens; and

WHEREAS, Throughout Pennsylvania, citizens who submit to HIV testing should be entitled to anonymity. The consequences of a consumer's HIV status becoming public should be a concern to all citizens of Philadelphia. Rural, Suburban and Urban Pennsylvanians could all face physical and emotional harm if their status became publicly known; and

WHEREAS, It is paramount that concerned citizens have access to HIV testing without any unnecessary impediments or delays. Early detection of HIV leads to more effective prevention strategies and treatment possibilities. Studies have shown that mandatory HIV names reporting would result in fewer individuals being tested, including a 1995 Los Angeles study which found that 86.1% of respondents would not have sought an HIV test if they knew their names were going to be reported to a governmental agency. Names based surveillance will force many consumers to delay HIV testing and/or disregard HIV testing further endangering their health; and

WHEREAS, Other than Pennsylvania's Act 148 (35 P.S. §7601

et. seq

. concerning the confidentiality of HIV-related information), no strong Federal or state privacy law governing health information currently exists; and

WHEREAS, Recent court decisions suggest limited or no discrimination protections for asymptomatic HIV positive individuals under the American with Disabilities Act (ADA); now therefore

RESOLVED, THAT THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Supports the development of a non name-based HIV surveillance system to achieve the public health goals of HIV surveillance and urges the City of Philadelphia to not comply with a proposed name based HIV reporting system.

FURTHER RESOLVED, That the City of Philadelphia calls on the Federal Government and Commonwealth to provide the resources necessary to support Philadelphia's non name-based surveillance systems. That the City of Philadelphia calls on the Bush and Ridge Administrations, the United States Congress and the Pennsylvania State Legislature, to enact and enforce strong confidentiality laws to protect the privacy of all health-related information.

End

Timeline

File history

A file can move through several public steps, including introduction, hearings, amendments, votes and final action. This timeline puts those events in date order, groups routine entries from the same day, and attaches published member votes to the action they record.

  1. UnanimousCITY COUNCIL

    Introduced

    Marked unanimous; no member-by-member tally published.

    Pass
    Official action detail

    A motion was made by Councilmember Ortiz that this matter be Introduced. The motion carried unanimously.

    Source: LegislationDetail.aspx · gridLegislation

    Council ActionCITY COUNCIL

    READ

    Other recorded action without a published tally.

    Official action detail

    Source: LegislationDetail.aspx · gridLegislation

    Council ActionCITY COUNCIL

    ADOPTED

    Other recorded action without a published tally.

    Official action detail

    Source: LegislationDetail.aspx · gridLegislation