WHEREAS,
The recent reassessment notices issued by the Board of Revision of Taxes (“BRT”) have left thousands of Philadelphia property owners angered at the large percentage increases they are being asked to pay, and confused as to how the system of property tax reassessment works; and
WHEREAS,
Council has held hearings to investigate the assessment process, and a bill has been introduced to reform the assessment process by reassigning the powers, duties and functions now exercised and performed by the Board of Revision of Taxes to three newly-created agencies, subject to approval of the voters; and
WHEREAS,
Until reform of the assessment process has been accomplished, it is appropriate to protect taxpayers from the unfairness of bearing the burden of a large percentage increase in real estate tax liability in any one year; and
WHEREAS,
While Council has held hearings on bills that would freeze or cap assessments, the City Solicitor has advised Council that in his opinion, various provisions of the Philadelphia Home Rule Charter and state law prevent Council from providing immediate relief to taxpayers during the current fiscal year; and
WHEREAS,
It is therefore appropriate to request action by the General Assembly to provide immediate relief to taxpayers; now therefore
RESOLVED, BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA,
That Council hereby requests the Pennsylvania General Assembly to amend the statute governing the making of assessments in Counties of the First Class (72 P.S. §5341.1
et seq.
) to provide that:
(a)the Board of Revision of Taxes (“BRT”) shall not certify any assessments of real property for calendar year 2002 or calendar year 2003 that exceed the prior year’s assessment for any particular property by such percentage amount as Council shall ordain, provided that such maximum percentage increase shall be no less than four percent (4%) and no greater than ten percent (10%);
(b)if the BRT has certified any assessments for calendar year 2002 that exceed the maximum percentage increase ordained by Council, then such certification shall be annulled, and the BRT shall be required to recertify assessments for calendar year 2002 meeting the maximum percentage increase ordained by Council, such recertification not to extend the time for any appeal; and
(c)the Council may further provide by ordinance that the maximum percentage increase in assessments shall only apply if a property is owned by the same person who owned the property at the time of the prior year's tax levy.
End
