Skip to main content
Back to search resultsResolution 170251

Urging the United States Congress to reject H.R.785, also known as the National Right-to-Work Act, due to the legislation's negative impact on the ability of unions to bargain on behalf of working-class families.

View file history View official file on Legistar →

File details

Status
Adopted
Type
Resolution
Introduced
March 9, 2017
Sponsors
Kenyatta JohnsonCHCouncilmember HenonCGCouncilmember GreenCPCouncilmember ParkerCindy BassCurtis Jones, Jr.CRCouncilmember Reynolds BrownCGCouncilmember GreenleeMark SquillaCBCouncilmember BlackwellCTCouncilmember Taubenberger

Full Bill

WHEREAS, H.R.785, better known as the National Right-to-Work Act, aims to prevent employers and unions from entering into union-security agreements, which allow unions in workplaces with such agreements to collect dues from non-members to help cover the costs of negotiation. Without such agreements, unions would face a ‘free-rider’ problem, whereby non-members would be able to reap the benefits of collective bargaining without paying the costs necessary to secure those benefits; and

WHEREAS, Unions have played a crucial role in raising the standard of living for members and non-members alike, using the power of collective bargaining to transform the relationship between employers and employees. Collective bargaining benefits include better healthcare coverage, higher wages and a more secure retirement; and

WHEREAS, A union’s ability to effectively advocate on behalf of workers is put in jeopardy when individuals are able to take advantage of negotiated benefits without paying for the costs of negotiation. Right-to-work legislation will prevent unions from recouping those costs from non-members and effectively incentivize non-membership. If unions are deprived of the resources necessary to stand up for workers, working-class families will likely see a marked decline in their standard of living; and

WHEREAS, While one of the bill’s primary sponsors in the House of Representatives, Rep. Joe Wilson, argues that the goal of federal right-to-work legislation is “to protect American workers,” in effect the law will drastically undermine workers’ ability to collectively bargain for higher wages and better working conditions; and

WHEREAS, Unions have historically provided workers with robust protection against unfair employment practices, and their advocacy has helped to lift the standard of living for millions of Americans. The National Right-to-Work Act will severely hamper unions’ ability to effectively represent working class families and continue that mission; now, therefore, be it

RESOLVED, BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, That the Council hereby urges the United States Congress to reject H.R.785, also known as the National Right-to-Work Act, due to the legislation’s negative impact on the ability of unions to bargain on behalf of working-class families.

End

Timeline

File history

A file can move through several public steps, including introduction, hearings, amendments, votes and final action. This timeline puts those events in date order, groups routine entries from the same day, and attaches published member votes to the action they record.

  1. Council ActionCITY COUNCIL

    ADOPTED

    Other recorded action without a published tally.

    Official action detail

    Source: LegislationDetail.aspx · gridLegislation

  2. UnanimousCITY COUNCIL

    Introduced and Ordered Placed On Next Week's Final Passage Calendar

    Marked unanimous; no member-by-member tally published.

    Pass
    Official action detail

    A motion was made by Councilmember Johnson that this matter be Introduced and Ordered Placed On Next Week's Final Passage Calendar. The motion carried unanimously.

    Source: LegislationDetail.aspx · gridLegislation