Not available
Please note: this meeting's minutes have not been finalized yet. Actions taken on legislation and their results are not available.
WHEREAS, A Pew study focusing on debt cases, published on March 3, 2023, found that individuals were not being served properly, thus resulting in default judgments; and
WHEREAS, A default judgment is an automatic ruling in favor of the plaintiff, often resulting in harmful financial penalties for the defendant, including asset seizure and wage garnishment. The individuals being served improperly are usually socioeconomically challenged, meaning they are highly affected by these judgments, as they may not be able to acquire jobs and other important opportunities; and
WHEREAS, An inadequate notification of a case could either be when the individual never receives their service, through no fault of their own or when the individual receives the service but the documents are unclear due to legal jargon or a lack of critical information; and
WHEREAS, The failure to properly serve an individual not only disadvantages him or her in being able to advocate for themselves but also wastes court and taxpayer resources; and
WHEREAS, Courts have a duty to ensure that all parties can fully engage in a case. Therefore, it is in the hands of the court administrator to ensure that individuals, especially those without access to an attorney, are informed about and able to participate in a lawsuit; and
WHEREAS, A similar Pew report, published on October 26, 2022, examines this problem specifically in Philadelphia. The study finds high rates of default judgments, which can be attributed to faulty service of process; and
WHEREAS, The problem of failure of service aligns with a national concern for the legal adequacy and sufficiency of service of process practices. Reform needs to begin in Philadelphia where citizens are being profoundly affected; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, That it hereby authorizes the City Committee on Law and Government to hold hearings examining the rate of judgments in small claims court.
End
Timeline
A file can move through several public steps, including introduction, hearings, amendments, votes and final action. This timeline puts those events in date order, groups routine entries from the same day, and attaches published member votes to the action they record.
Please note: this meeting's minutes have not been finalized yet. Actions taken on legislation and their results are not available.