Skip to main content
Back to search resultsBill 230571

Amending Chapter 9-3500 of The Philadelphia Code, entitled "Fair Criminal Record Screening Standards," to add provisions regarding the consideration of convictions that result in exoneration and make related technical changes, all under certain terms and conditions.

AI summary

The enacted measure amends Philadelphia’s fair criminal record screening rules to define exoneration and prohibit City agencies and private employers from rejecting applicants or employees based on convictions that resulted in exoneration. It also limits consideration of other convictions to those from fewer than seven years earlier, excluding time spent incarcerated, and requires an individualized assessment rather than automatic exclusion.

File details

Status
ENACTED
Introduced
September 14, 2023
View official record ↗

Full text

THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA HEREBY ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 9-3500 of The Philadelphia Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

TITLE 9. REGULATION OF BUSINESSES, TRADES AND PROFESSIONS.

CHAPTER 9-3500. FAIR CRIMINAL RECORD SCREENING STANDARDS

§ 9-3502. Definitions.

As used in this Chapter the following terms have the following meanings:

(3) Conditional offer of employment means an offer by an employer to hire an applicant, which may be withdrawn only if the employer subsequently determines that the applicant (i) has a conviction [record]

that did not result in exoneration and

which, based on an individualized assessment as required by [subsection 9-3504(2),]

subsection 9-3504(3),

would reasonably lead an employer to conclude that the applicant would pose an unacceptable risk in the position applied for; or (ii) does not meet other legal or physical requirements of the job.

(4) Conviction shall mean any sentence arising from a verdict or plea of guilty or nolo contendere, including a sentence of incarceration, a suspended sentence, a sentence of probation or a sentence of unconditional discharge.

(5.2)

Exoneration means the reversal or vacation of a conviction by pardon, acquittal, dismissal or other post-conviction re-examination of the case by a court or other authorized government official.

§ 9-3504. Prohibition Against Unfair Discrimination Against Persons Previously Convicted of One or More Criminal Offenses.

(2)

It shall be an unlawful discriminatory practice for a City agency or private employer to reject an Applicant or Employee based on a conviction that resulted in exoneration.

(3)

No employer shall maintain a policy of automatically excluding any Applicant or Employee with a criminal conviction from a job or class of jobs. A prospective employer shall not reject an Applicant or Employee based on his or her criminal record, [unless]

unless:

such record includes conviction for an offense that

did not later result in exoneration; the conviction

bears such relationship to the Employment sought that the employer may reasonably conclude that the Applicant or Employee would present an unacceptable risk to the operation of the business or to co-workers or [customers,]

customers;

and that exclusion of the Applicant or Employee is compelled by business necessity. An employer shall make a determination regarding such risk only after reviewing the Applicant's or Employee's specific record and the particular job being sought, and conducting an individualized assessment of the risk presented. Such assessment shall include:

[(3)]

(4)

A City agency or private employer may consider, for employment purposes, an Applicant's or Employee's conviction record only to the extent that the conviction

did not result in exoneration and

occurred fewer than seven (7) years from the date of the inquiry. Any period of incarceration shall not be included in the calculation of the seven (7) year period.

___________________________________

Explanation:

[Brackets] indicate matter deleted.

Italics

indicate new matter added.

End

File history

Sometimes city council's record keeping is not complete. This timeline reflects the information on the council's legistar website.
  1. Council actionMAYOR

    Signed

  2. Council actionCITY COUNCIL

    Ordered placed on this day`s first reading calendar

    Council actionCITY COUNCIL

    Read and ordered placed on next week's second reading calendar

    Council actionCITY COUNCIL

    Suspend the rules of the council

  3. Council actionCommittee on Public Safety

    Reported favorably, rule suspension requested

    Council actionCommittee on Public Safety

    Amended

    Council actionCommittee on Public Safety

    Hearing held

    Council actionCommittee on Public Safety

    Hearing notices sent

  4. CITY COUNCIL

    Details not published

    No details have been published for this item. Legistar notes that this meeting's minutes have not been finalized.